| Fred Ecks ( @ 2007-01-19 12:02:00 |
Income vs. Expenses
I've run across a couple of items in the past few days which relate income and expenses. One was an article discussing car expenses, saying that folks shouldn't spend more than about 20% of their income on their cars. Another was a piece on retirement, estimating post-retirement expenses as some percentage of pre-retirement income.
I don't get it. Why would someone earning $60k/year spend twice as much as someone earning $30k? I've never quite understood that. Do high-income people eat more? Wear more clothing? Need bigger beds and cushier cars?
I used to make a good corporate wage as a software engineer. But even then, a bicycle was fine transportation, and a burrito was a plenty-big meal. All the estimates I see out there in the popular press tell me that I "need" thousands of dollars a month to live now, yet my baseline expenses total not much over $500/month.
I just think it's weird the way a person's expenses are expected to be related to their income. I mean, why?
I've run across a couple of items in the past few days which relate income and expenses. One was an article discussing car expenses, saying that folks shouldn't spend more than about 20% of their income on their cars. Another was a piece on retirement, estimating post-retirement expenses as some percentage of pre-retirement income.
I don't get it. Why would someone earning $60k/year spend twice as much as someone earning $30k? I've never quite understood that. Do high-income people eat more? Wear more clothing? Need bigger beds and cushier cars?
I used to make a good corporate wage as a software engineer. But even then, a bicycle was fine transportation, and a burrito was a plenty-big meal. All the estimates I see out there in the popular press tell me that I "need" thousands of dollars a month to live now, yet my baseline expenses total not much over $500/month.
I just think it's weird the way a person's expenses are expected to be related to their income. I mean, why?